Close

Sun Subscriber Login

Username:  


Password:



Please wait....
 
News Story
Updated: 10/27/2012 09:20:06PM

Election’s final full week

Share this story:


Republican presidential candidate and former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney greets supporters as he campaigns at the Pensacola Civic Center in Pensacola, Fla., Saturday, Oct. 27, 2012. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)

President Barack Obama holds 4-month-old Milan Maxey Young of Boston after arriving in Manchester, N.H. for a campaign stop Saturday, Oct. 27, 2012. (AP Photo/Winslow Townson)

President Barack Obama talks with supporters after arriving in Manchester, N.H. for a campaign stop Saturday, Oct. 27, 2012. (AP Photo/Winslow Townson)

By STEVE PEOPLES
and THOMAS BEAUMONT

Text Size:


PENSACOLA, Fla. — One final jobs report before Election Day and the big storm threatening the East Coast loom large as President Barack Obama and Republican Mitt Romney head into the final full week of campaigning in a race polls show is extraordinarily close.

Democrats claim math is on the president’s side. Republicans insist Romney’s got the momentum.

“We’re seeing more and more enthusiasm, and more and more support,” a confident Romney says in messages to supporters, arguing that his performances in the three presidential debates has reinvigorated his campaign and created a national movement.

Obama is banking on his get-out-the-vote efforts in the most competitive states. He’s also making personal appeals as he encourages Americans to stick with him for a second term. During a whirlwind tour last week through some of the most pivotal states, he said, “After all these years, you know me. You know I mean what I say.”

In pursuit of the 270 electoral votes for victory, each nominee is starting to make his closing arguments. The goal is to win over the narrow slice of undecided, independent voters, moderates and women in particular, and to persuade supporters to vote on Nov. 6, if not earlier in the many states where voting is under way. Roughly one-third of the electorate will have voted before Election Day.

The question now is whether the momentum Romney picked up after the debates is growing and can overcome the president’s strong voter-identification and early voting efforts in the tightest states.

The campaigns are scrambling to tweak schedules, shift manpower and pump millions of more dollars into TV ads in the nine states that will determine the outcome. Deep-pocketed outside groups are paying for direct mail, automated phone calls and other get-out-the-vote efforts.

Total campaign spending has exceeded $2 billion, making this presidential race the most expensive in the history of electoral politics.

But there’s a risk that all those commercials, phone calls and mailings have caused many people to tune out.

“I’m so sick of those commercials,” said Cora Blakey, a retiree who stood in long lines with about 13,000 people to see Obama last week at an outdoor park in Las Vegas. “Everybody’s bashing everybody. When they come on, I turn the channel.”

Any number of factors still could shift the race.

A massive weather system bearing down on the East Coast threatens to complicate the final days of campaigning and early voting across at least four pivotal states —New Hampshire, North Carolina, Ohio and Virginia.

With each man claiming to be best able to revive the struggling economy, the latest jobs report due Friday from the Labor Department will shine an 11th-hour spotlight on the country’s health four days before most people vote. Last week, the most recent snapshot of economic growth showed the U.S. recovery remains tepid.

At Romney’s Boston base and Obama’s Chicago headquarters, aides are focused on the factors they can control. That means how and where their candidate spends his time and money in the nine states that will decide the outcome — Colorado, Florida, Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada, North Carolina, Ohio, Wisconsin and Virginia.

Both sides acknowledge that Obama has a larger campaign organization on the ground in most states, and that Democrats have an edge in the push to get supporters to the polls early in many of the most competitive states.

Obama advisers insist he is leading or tied in all nine of those states, though strategists in both parties say North Carolina has shifted toward Romney in recent days. Romney aides insist that state-based polling underestimates the former Massachusetts governor’s popularity with independents.

Obama’s campaign is confident about Ohio, Iowa, Nevada and Wisconsin; the race looks tighter in Colorado, Virginia and Florida. Democrats also voiced confidence in New Hampshire, though there is little early voting in the state, making it harder to gauge now.

Despite the heavy focus on turnout, Obama’s campaign says it is still working to persuade undecided voters and soft Romney supporters to back the president. That’s why Obama is focusing much of his travel in the campaign’s final stretch on swing areas of competitive states, including Green Bay, Wis., Orlando and Denver. Romney is focused on Ohio, Florida and Wisconsin and expects to travel to New Hampshire on Tuesday.

Obama aides say they expect the demographics of the electorate to look similar to the 2008 election, with slight increases in black and Hispanic voters. They attribute that both to natural population growth and the campaign’s efforts to boost minority voter registration.

While Romney and Obama are deadlocked in national polls, there were signs that the burst of momentum Romney got from the debates had waned in Ohio, Virginia and elsewhere. Because Obama starts with more states and votes solidly in his expected win column, Romney’s team has fewer ways to reach the 270 electoral votes.

Seeking to create more options and influence voters in neighboring states, Romney has made modest television advertising investments in Minnesota and Maine, competing in states that haven’t supported a Republican in at least two decades.

Ohio and Wisconsin, where Democrats have an edge, have emerged as linchpins to his strategy.

Democratic strategists say that Romney’s opposition to the auto bailout that resurrected the American auto industry continues to hurt him across the industrial Midwest. Obama seized on Romney’s position during last week’s third and final debate, a moment Democrats say helped reverse the Republican candidate’s momentum among working class white voters, an important constituency in blue-collar Ohio.

“To his credit, Romney got himself back into the race. But it’s not enough,” said Tad Devine, a Democratic strategist and senior adviser to 2000 and 2004 presidential nominees Al Gore and John Kerry.

Still, Romney was greeted by large enthusiastic crowds in the thousands in Ohio, Iowa and Florida in recent days, a sign Republican pollsters and strategists attributed to higher intensity of support from his campaign’s base.

Romney aides suggest that swing-state polls overestimate Obama’s support. Obama aides dismiss polls showing Obama losing support among women.

“It’s going to be a tight race right to the end,” said Romney senior strategist Eric Fehrnstrom. “But we’re riding a wave and it hasn’t hit the beach yet.”

Both sides agree this race will be won at the margins.

That explains why Obama’s campaign has been working hard to undercut Romney’s support among women by citing links between Romney and an Indiana Senate candidate, Richard Mourdock, who drew fire for saying that pregnancies resulting from rape are “something God intended.” Romney aides said he disagreed with the comment but Romney himself refused to condemn the remark or call on Mourdock to remove TV ads the GOP presidential nominee had filmed for him.

The renewed attention on abortion came just as polls showed Romney having narrowed Obama’s advantage with women. Now Democratic pollsters say they see evidence that Romney may be losing those gains among women, especially in Virginia and Colorado.

Not that he’s ceding ground.

“These are tough times for middle-income Americans,” Romney said Friday night in North Canton, Ohio. “How many single moms these days are scrimping and saving so they can put a good meal on the table at the end of the day for their kids?”


Reader Comments (6)

The chief complaint against Barack Obama is that he promised hope and change in 2008 and has not delivered. In fact, Obama failed to adequately define hope and change. Most people wanted a new type of politics to replace old-style politics; one not dominated by money and political self-interest. Instead, the Supreme Court gave us Citizens United. Everyone who believed in Obama's goals of hope and change interpreted those goals the way they wanted to. No one established a measurable time-frame to achieve hope and change. The type of new politics people expected could not be instituted in one term. In order for change to occur changes would need to take place concurrently in Congress and in the executive branch other than with the presidency. People forget change has to begin with each of us. Where were all the voters who elected Obama in 2010. Many stayed home and allowed the tea party to elect a record number of inexperienced members to Congress, who thought they could balance the federal budget by using a mandatory debt ceiling as leverage. Looking back, Obama has had several important achievements, including ending the Bush "war of choice" in Iraq, establishing a firm date for Afghanistan withdrawal, ending Don't As Don't Tell, getting a law passed that establishes equal pay for equal work for women, doubling of the stock market, GM and Chrysler pulled from the brink of extinction, and a nearly 100-year struggle started under Teddy Roosevelt to establish a national health insurance program. On the evening Obama was inaugurated, GOP leaders met and plotted to make Obama a one-term president. They intended to insure that outcome by obstructing the Congress from acting. This is not fantasy. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell publicly admitted his role in this plot and has reaffirmed the will of the GOP to carry it out. Some people do not look at the fairness of the matter. They simply say either Obama got the job done or he didn't. I do not subscribe to that line of thinking but I understand it. A word of caution, though. If we establish a precedent of rewarding a political party for obstructing government then what is to stop the Democrats from deliberately stonewalling the next GOP administration? An equally cogent rationale for not rewarding the GOP's dubious tactics is seen in the choices between the parties' policy agendas. Democrats want to protect and expand the middle-class while the GOP is stuck on a strategy of more tax cuts for the wealthy seasoned with an abundance of social values initiatives. The trickle-down nonsense that underlies the GOP tax cut strategy does not work! It did not work under Ronald Reagan or George W. Bush. Why would we go down that road again? Despite GOP obstruction, Obama has slowly nudged the economy forward. We have seen small, steady job growth, the rate of mortgage foreclosures dropping dramatically and home prices rising again in many parts of the country. GOP policies will drive us back into the ditch. Another reason to be weary of the GOP is the trust factor. This column has pointed out several instances in the past where Mitt Romney has lied as part of selling himself. During the first debate, though he succeeded in making himself look good and "won" the debate, Willard made himself the all-time Liar in Chief. The media documented more than a half-dozen Romney misstatements. The real whopper was Willard's claim he had no knowledge of a $5 trillion tax cut proposal he has been selling for the past year, We will not reward Willard by putting him in the white House? We continue and not start over with Romney who cannot make up his mind on which Romney candidate will lead us (Romney or Multiple Choice Romney) Re-elect Obama!
Posted by Lisa Lakotich on Sunday, October 28, 2012 10:36:03AM


Multiple Choice,’ Romney Abortion 1993: Personally opposed, but let women decide themselves GovWatch: 2002: “preserve & protect” right to choose Top Romney Flip Flops: #1. Abortion: In October 2002, campaigning for governorship of Massachusetts, Mitt Romney said he would “preserve and protect” a woman’s right to choose. He now describes himself as opposing abortion. Source: GovWatch on 2008 campaign: “Top Ten Flip-Flops” Feb 5, 2008 Here’s Romney at a September debate in Iowa: “I never said I was pro-choice, but my position was effectively pro-choice. I’ve said that time and time again. I’ve changed my position.“ NOW THE BIG ONE: During his 1994 Senate Run, Mitt Romney argued that he was more pro-choice than Ted Kennedy FLIP: “my mother and my family have been committed to the belief that we can believe as we want, but we will not force our beliefs on others on that matter, and you will not see me wavering on that.’” (Joan Vennochi, “Romney’s Revolving World,” The Boston Globe, 3/2/06) “I believe that abortion should be safe and legal in this country. I have since the time that my mom took that position when she ran in 1970 as a US Senate candidate. I believe that since Roe v. Wade has been the law for 20 years we should sustain and support it.” (Joan Vennochi, “Romney’s Revolving World,” The Boston Globe, 3/2/06) FLOP: “When I am asked if I am pro-choice or pro-life, I say I refuse to accept either label.” (Glen Warchol, “This Is The Place, But Politics May Lead Romneys Elsewhere,” The Salt Lake Tribune, 2/14/99) But I'm running for office in Massachusetts again, so I'm pro-choice again FLIP: “I will preserve and protect a woman’s right to choose, and am devoted and dedicated to honoring my word in that regard. I will not change any provisions of Massachusetts’ pro-choice laws.” (2002 Romney-O’Brien Gubernatorial Debate, Suffolk University, Boston, MA, 10/29/02) In 2002, Romney Offered His Completed NARAL Questionnaire, Filled Out With “Mostly Abortion-Rights Positions,” To The Media Even Before Returning It To NARAL. “Yesterday, Romney also aimed to head off confusion about his stance on abortion rights by answering a Mass National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League questionnaire with mostly abortion-rights positions. He offered the questionnaire to the press even before he returned it to MassNARAL...” FLOP: Then he started thinking of national office as a Republican. ANd he happened to have a revelation FLOP: "Romney said he had a change of heart on the issue after speaking with a stem-cell researcher, Dr. Douglas Melton. Romney claims Melton said ‘Look, you don’t have to think about this stem cell research as a moral issue, because we kill the embryos after 14 days.’ ‘It hit me very hard that we had so cheapened the value of human life in a Roe v. Wade environment that it was important to stand for the dignity of human life,’ Romney says.” (Karen Tumulty, “What Romney Believes,” Time, 5/21/07)
Posted by Lisa Lakotich on Sunday, October 28, 2012 10:38:32AM


• Courts added tax-paid abortions to RomneyCare; not me. (Jan 2012) • I had no litmus test for appointing judges, but I'm pro-life. (Jan 2012) • Scientifically, life begins at conception. (Jan 2012) • 1990: As church leader, urged at-risk mom against abortion. (Jan 2012) • 1994: Supported abortion rights but personally opposed. (Jan 2012) • Firmly pro-life; including Court nominations. (Jun 2011) • Abortion decision should recognize TWO lives involved. (Mar 2010) • OpEd: baroque circumlocutions on evolving abortion stance. (Aug 2009) • I took action as governor to preserve the sanctity of life. (Dec 2007) • No punishment for women who have partial birth abortions. (Dec 2007) • Two-step process: overturn Roe; then change hearts & minds. (Sep 2007) • Firmly in the “legal but rare” camp. (Aug 2007) • Following in Reagan’s footsteps in converting to pro-life. (Aug 2007) • Absolute good day for America when Roe v. Wade is repealed. (May 2007) • Personally pro-life, but government should not intrude. (May 2007) • Was effectively pro-choice until cloning changed his opinion. (May 2007) • Breach of Constitution for justices to adjust Constitution. (Mar 2007) • Now firmly pro-life, despite 2002 tolerance for abortion. (Dec 2006) • Anti-abortion views have “evolved & deepened” while governor. (Jul 2005) • Personally against abortion, but pro-choice as governor. (Mar 2002) • For safe, legal abortion since relative’s death from illegal. (Oct 1994) • Flip Flop Romney/ Multiple Choice,’ Romney http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/OTUS/mitt-romneys-abortion-evolution/story?id=17443452 http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2012/10/10/162667478/romney-causes-yet-another-abortion-stir http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/09/mitt-romney-abortion_n_1952780.html
Posted by Lisa Lakotich on Sunday, October 28, 2012 10:39:05AM


Previous Page | Next Page

Submit your comment below:







  

* = Required information

Comments that include profanity, personal attacks, or antisocial behavior such as "spamming", "trolling", or any other inappropriate material will be removed from the site. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our terms of use. You are fully responsible for the content you post. All comments must comply with the Terms and Conditions of this site and by submitting comments you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.


ADVERTISEMENT